Long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use is on the rise among women 15-44, a trend which is attributed to their high efficacy (over 99%) and elimination of potential user error. Access can be an issue for traditional LARCs, since they require physician insertion/removal, as only 56% of office-based reproductive-health doctors offer on-site IUD procedures and only 32% offer implant procedures. In addition, many patients are afraid of the pain and complications that can be associated with IUD insertion/removal procedures.
- What factors into your discussions with women looking for long-acting reversible contraception, and what feedback do you hear from them regarding the available options?
- Do you have patients who are ready for a LARC, but don’t want the commitment?
- Are you aware that there is now an LARC alternative that you can discuss with patients and prescribe? If so, what have been your experiences with this alternative?
-
Ramzy Rimawi4yrLARCs are discussed in patients willing to undergo placement/removal and accepting of the possible complications (DVT, infection, etc). LARCs should be offered just to expand on patient options, but emphasized Show More -
George Elias4yrI am a family practice physician who loves to recommend LARC to patients. I do not put them in or remove them, but have associates that will for me. Show More